Haiku Contest for International Car Free Day!

The contest is now closed.  You can see results HERE.  Thanks to all who participated!

Have you ever been in a town where walking, biking, or public transit is a viable way to get around on a regular basis? Do you miss that freedom?

Have you ever gone a day, week, month, or year without driving a car, but were still able to get around?

Does it strike you as silly that the Triangle doesn’t yet have a commuter rail system?

The Village Project promotes and celebrates transportation options because we believe that a society where the use of the personal car is optional is a more equitable and a more sustainable society.

To celebrate Car Free Day, we want to hear about your experiences with cars and their ills or your thoughts on ways to go car-lite. But, we want it in a haiku! (A haiku is a poem with 3 lines, where the first line has 5 syllables, the second line has 7, and the third line has 5 again.)

Entering is easy! Here’s what to do:

  1. Write as many haikus as you like! 
  2. If you haven’t already, register on the blog (so we can find you if you win!)
  3. “Leave a Comment” to this post with your haiku(s) BY SEPTEMBER 22nd.  Please submit only one haiku per comment.

We will have several categories for the competition and really, any haiku goes! But to get your poetic juices flowing, you could compose a haiku about traffic frustrations, the fun of biking, the freedom and peacefulness of walking, or your other favorite non-car way of getting around (scooting, rollerblading, whatever!). The categories for the Haiku Contest are:

  • Best overall
  • Most humorous
  • Most persuasive
  • Best rant
  • Most inspirational
  • Best use of the senses

There are many great prizes (e.g., a bike helmet, a restaurant gift certificate, and a bike from the Recyclery!).  The grand prize will go to the author of the winning submission, which will be included in press releases about the event. The judges for this contest are  influential members of the community: Jay Bryan, Carrboro Poet Laureate; Ruby Sinreich, Creator and moderator of Orange Politics; Kirk Ross, longtime newspaper reporter, columnist and editor; and Jean Earnhardt, Longtime community activist & conservationist.

This Haiku Contest is hosted by The Village Project to promote International Car Free Day. International Car Free Day is an “annual celebration of cities and public life, free from the noise, stress and pollution of cars” that is observed on September 22nd.

To learn more about the competition, check out the Haiku Contest Rules.

To submit your haiku, leave a comment to this post.

Prizes courtesy of The Recyclery, Chapel Hill Restaurant Group, The Village Project, and Weaver Street Market. THANKS!

Posted in Chapel Hill, Transportation | 156 Comments

Lessons Learned from Rome’s Public Spaces

During a recent trip to Italy, again and again, I heard the phrase repeated “Don’t bother driving in Rome.”  Good advice.  To drive is to be caught in the soul-destroying and labyrinthine city street network, forever bottle-necking into tiny, one lane roads, battling cars in a city that’s not meant for them.  How could you ever enjoy such a place trapped on the wrong side of the windshield, blocked off from what makes this city so great – its pedestrian roots.  Rome is a large city, but it’s best seen by foot.  And though the metro’s reach is limited by underground ruins, it is fast and efficient, making it a good launching point for pedestrian jaunts.

The journey in Rome starts with a walk down one of the many slim alleyways and streets.  These pedestrian-friendly veins of the city are densely-packed and shop-lined, bustling with foot traffic – rarely a car in sight – full of bakeries and wine bars, eventually opening into beautiful public spaces.  Many of these spaces are surrounded by shops, trattorias and outdoor cafes, with locals and tourists alike enjoying dining al freso, basking in the sun and each other’s company.  Architectural elements lead the eyes to the center of most of these spaces – perhaps a small park with benches.  One might also see a beautifully-designed, triangular piazza, encompassing a fountain of a sinking ship, in turn, abutting the most famous staircase in all of Italy – the Spanish Steps.  People are everywhere, eating gelato, bargaining for wares in the informal markets, or just sitting on one of the grandiose stoops, sharing a conversation.  The Spanish Steps are a good example of a public space with plenty of economic and social activity.  Humans have taken over the adjacent road, so cars are forced to follow their traffic laws as opposed to the other way around.  Because of this, we see more activity and business for the surrounding shops and vendors.

View from the top of the Spanish Steps

Perhaps one of these slim streets opens into the Piazza Navona.  The 400-year-old battle between Borromini and Bernini is on display in the center fountain – one of three – and the chapel just beyond it.  If overly dumbstruck by the sheer audacity of the baroque, one can blindly stumble into one of many outdoor cafes and trattoria lining the piazza for a nice leisurely meal, taking in the sights from the sideline, watching the street performers and the rest of the public as they meander by.   Yet another reason to leave the car behind: many Roman piazzas and squares are pedestrian and bicycle traffic only.  Though these places can be massive, the fact that there are no cars blasting by and human beings are walking everywhere tends to humanize the scale.  A lesson for public spaces here:  What was once daunting becomes easily traversable by foot when there are no automobiles to dodge and no traffic signals to contend with.

Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi and Borromini's Chapel in Piazza Navona

One might also be led, via winding alleyway, into Campo de’ Fiori.  Formerly a flower-selling square, Campo is now a daily open-air market, aflutter with human traffic, shopping for clothing, breads, vegetables, wines, cheeses, spices, and fruits of every variety.  Give your feet a rest at one of the many open trattorias lining the square or grab a slab of pizza by the kilo at Forno.  The relationship between food market and restaurant is plain to see.  The same ingredients people are shopping for in the square are integral to the restaurants surrounding it.  The purchasing process becomes a method of connecting, and ultimately, a process of building and maintaining relationships.  You can see echoes of this tradition in the Durham and Carrboro farmers markets, as well as the farm-to-table/restaurant movements.  Nothing gives a community or city a better sense of place than an open-air market filled not just with vegetables, but with the human interaction we so desire.  It’s also nice to see that this tradition has no geographic limit.  In Carrboro and Durham, as in Rome, this is not just some anachronistic and quaint fetish, but a vital part of the local community.

Fruits being sold at the massive farmer's market in the middle of Campo de' Fiori

The Roman piazza formula is complex, evolving over many centuries, but many of them incorporate at least four elements:  a center, which might include a place for congregation or relaxation – a park, garden, or an artistic point of interest; architectural elements, including steps, chapels, bridges, palaces, and ruins; economic points of interest, including markets, restaurants, shops, and cafes; and pedestrian and bike traffic only areas – if not official, then openly nourished by constant foot and pedal traffic.

Though we don’t share much in common with Roman art and history, we do share a need for community and a sense of place, a desire for safety, good health, walkability, public beauty, and a thriving local economy in our built environment.  While some Roman piazzas may be ostentatious to our modern sensibilities and wallets, Rome gives us a formula for how these spaces can and do work.

Posted in Biking, Land Use, Pedestrians, Transportation, Visioning | Tagged | 1 Comment

“Small Town” Motorist Parks Illegally, Gets $50 Ticket, Plays the Yard Sale Card in Newspaper Instead of Paying $1.25 to Park

One of the most common topics within the Letters to the Editor section of the Chapel Hill News are various complaints about how various urban practices are ruining Downtown Chapel Hill.  Yesterday’s rant from Perry Deane Young complaining that parking was not free and available directly in front of a recent yard sale he attended is quite representative of the genre:

It was a balmy Saturday morning in Chapel Hill, a relaxed time for farmers’ markets and yard sales. Several of us had parked along Kenan Street for an interesting sale in the historic building on the corner.If there were “No Parking” signs, I certainly didn’t see them. And even if there were, it was a Saturday and it was a yard sale, for God’s sake. [emphasis by blog poster]

While we were inside, an overzealous meter man gleefully wrote out $50 tickets and posted them on a dozen different windshields.

He goes on to state that the town of Chapel Hill enforcing its own regulations (during a yard sale!) is indecent and not in keeping with the “small-town considerate thing.”

As I was heading out for errands a little after 9 am yesterday morning, I decided to take a drive up and down Kenan St to see if Mr. Young had indeed been a victim of a poorly signed road.  Alas, not so much. Driving south from Franklin to Cameron, there were four public “No Parking” signs in a stretch of less than 1000 feet.  Driving north from Cameron to Franklin, there were two, including the one directly in front of the house I assume he was visiting, since the other three corners are filled with two businesses and a standard 1960-70ish triplex.

No Parking Sign (1 of 6) on Kenan St

No Parking Sign (1 of 6 signs) on Kenan St

But did he have a choice?  Yes. Less than 300 feet away from the Kenan/Cameron intersection are several metered spaces available for $1.25/hour, 8 AM – 6 PM Monday through Saturday, that are free at other times.

Metered Parking on Cameron Avenue

Metered Parking on Cameron Avenue

This particular episode is quite unremarkable except for the two assumptions that underpin the letter, and the indignation with which those assumptions are expressed. The two assumptions are:

1.  Chapel Hill is a “small town” and should behave according to some Mayberry-esque schema of law enforcement to fit that profile.

2.  People should be able to park wherever they want, whenever they want, on public streets, for free.

Despite the protestations of some that Chapel Hill is a “village” of sorts, the hard fact of the matter is that Chapel Hill/Carrboro combine to comprise a small-sized American city or large town of approximately 77,000 people even if you do not count the on-campus students.  Throw them in and the community is pushing 90,000 residents with a larger daytime population due to commuting in for employment. This is not a small town, nor has it been one for some time.  For further perspective, the City of Asheville has 83,000 residents in the city limits.

Which brings us to the second point- the UNC campus and its greater environs, including Franklin St, is the Central Business District of this small city, and Kenan St is directly attached to it.  One of the principal reasons why Franklin St is so full of activity is that it places a premium on access for pedestrians over cars, and this prerogative is defended first and foremost by ticketing cars that don’t play by the rules.

If you like downtown and the vitality it provides, then you need to be onboard with paying for the valuable public right of way your 2500-3000 pounds of personal machinery takes away from everyone else when it is stored downtown, and not parking on the streets where the town has considered it suboptimal to the community for anybody to park. Otherwise you wind up with a classic Tragedy of the Commons and heavily congested streets that are bad for business due to low turnover, and more dangerous for pedestrians.

Posted in Chapel Hill, Parking, Urban Habits | Leave a comment

What makes a neighborhood walkable?

Different people have different definitions of exactly what constitutes a “walkable” neghborhood. Here is a sort of taxonomy that I propose when classifying the walkability of a neighborhood.

1. The ‘go for a walk’-able neighborhood.

Sidewalks are the only criteria for this category. Many neighborhoods in the Triangle and around the country, and in fact pretty much every single-use residnetial neighborhood built in a suburban environment since the 1990s meets this requirement. This is useful in that residents can walk for excercise or to visit neighbors without worrying about getting run over, but there’s usually nothing other than other houses or perhaps a neighborhood park within walking distance. Now, excercise is an essential part of daily life, but I wouldn’t call this a “walkable” neighborhood. It enables walking as a mode of recreation, but not as a mode of transportation. Always be wary when a real estate listing mentions that a home is in a walkable neighborhood – this is usually what they mean.

2. The internally walkable neighborhood.

This is for mixed-use developments with decent internal pedestrian infrastructure, and residences within walking distance of the on-site retail shops. This would be like North Hills in Raleigh or Southern Village in Chapel Hill. To be an “internally walkable” neighborhood, the on-site retail must include most of what residents need to access on a regular basis, such as grocers, drug stores, cleaners, and “third places” like coffee shops. However, usually these developments don’t include enough residents so that the retail can survive on internally captured trips alone, so the retail has a dual purpose – both as neighborhood retail for the on-site residents, and as a destination for people coming from further away (usually by car.) It’s convenient if you live on-site, but even then your options are limited as anything off-site is not within walking distance and the off-site pedestrian infrastructure is inferior.

3. The walkable neighborhood.

Any neighborhood where pretty much anything you’ll need is within walking distance is what I’d consider “walkable.” This includes downtown Carrboro or Cameron Village in Raleigh. Moderately dense, with decent walking infrastructure and adequate transit service to multiple destinations. This is a neighborhood where living without a car begins to seem plausible. Nevertheless, the infrastructure can still be focused around the automobile and service retail such as grocers, though close and convenient, still tend to focus on cars. The pedestrian infrastructure, though adequate, can be far from flawless. This is what WalkScore considers.

4. The pedestrian-oriented neighborhood.

In a neighborhood like this, walking is the primary mode of transportation. Everything from everyday service retail to restaurants, bars, and boutiques are within walking distance, and anything that’s not within walking distance can be easily reached by bike or transit. The pedestrian infrastructure is top notch, with high residential density, wide sidewalks and street facing retail galore. In contrast, using a car can seem like a hassle as parking is at least hidden away in decks, and often scarce, expensive, and inconvenient. In some cases, car ownership may even seem like a more of a burden than a benefit. I can think of no neighborhoods in the triangle that meet this criteria, though the cities’ downtowns have the potential to be so, but the major missing component is the service retail.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Can we pave our way out of traffic?

No one can question the fact that the Triangle is growing at a blistering rate. As the nation’s 3rd fastest growing metropolitan area continues on its path to add more than 1 million people over the next 20 years, it is clear that the status quo approach to regional transportation challenges is an unsustainable one.

Because transportation budgets are sensitive, and because area residents in 2020 will not like waiting in traffic to get past other motorists crawling onto the I-40 interchanges anymore then than they do now, a new approach is imperative. Rather than the status quo approach that currently treats roadways as free public goods, transportation research suggests that a more effective, lasting, and inexpensive solution lies in applying economic theory to the overall supply of transportation infrastructure. This does not necessarily mean enforcing toll roads, as reducing the supply of individual motorists by increasing the supply of public transit has proven effective elsewhere.

Imagine if UNC and Duke decided to give away basketball tickets to anyone willing to line up at the ticket booth. Is it really any different now when any motorist driving a personal vehicle can access I-40 for free during rush hour?

This story that appeared on NPR’s All Things Considered does a fantastic job of highlighting the application of economics to other large cities currently experiencing the transportation challenges we will hope to avoid: http://www.npr.org/2011/07/09/137708751/more-roads-may-pave-way-to-more-traffic

 

 

Posted in Biking, High Speed Rail, Infrastructure, Land Use, Pedestrians, Public Transit, Transportation, Visioning | 1 Comment